A refusal can be disappointing, especially when you hoped treatment would help. The most useful next step is to understand the exact reason. A well-organised file helps you ask focused questions and avoid repeatedly sending information that does not address the issue.

Read the whole response first

Place the letter, application date and insurance information together. Identify the medicine, purpose and period covered by the response. Sometimes the answer concerns only part of the cost or a missing document rather than every aspect of the request.

Check whether it is a formal decision, a request for information or general guidance. If unclear, ask the insurer to explain its status in plain language. Record the contact point and reference number so that further evidence can be attached to the correct case.

Identify the reason actually given

A benefit may be excluded by the relevant insurance system. Alternatively, particular requirements may not have been met or supported by evidence. A missing form or a prescriber who does not meet the specified requirements may be another issue. These situations call for different questions.

Countries differ substantially. Germany has a statutory benefit exclusion for medicines used for weight reduction, while other systems can apply narrowly defined conditions. A positive account from another country therefore does not establish an entitlement under your own arrangements.

Create a manageable file

Collect documents relevant to the case and keep originals secure. A one-page overview is often more useful than many unsorted attachments. Your treatment team can assess which clinical information accurately explains the application and which additional reports are actually necessary.

  • The decision or information request, including date and reference.
  • The original application and exact proposed treatment.
  • Existing reports and previous-care information, where requested.
  • A current quotation and a list of evidence still missing.
  • Conversation notes with the date, organisation and agreed next step.

Ask specific questions before resubmitting everything

Useful questions include: “Which requirement has not been met or evidenced in my application?” and “Which document would resolve the outstanding question?” Ask for the current basis of the decision and for clinical and procedural reasons to be explained separately.

If you want a review, ask which procedure applies. Pay attention to deadlines in the letter and obtain timely qualified advice in the relevant country if anything is unclear. This organisational overview does not assess your legal entitlement or the likelihood that an appeal would succeed.

Discuss the care plan alongside the funding issue

A funding decision does not, by itself, determine what care is clinically appropriate. Tell the practice openly if you cannot afford the cost. Together you can discuss available support and next steps without assuming payment has already been approved.

Do not start or alter treatment on the assumption that reimbursement will certainly follow. Adding diagnoses without a factual basis is not a useful route either. If treatment has already begun, raise financial difficulties early so the team can help plan continuing care.

Common questions

Should I immediately send the same application again?

First establish what is unresolved. An unchanged repeat will not fix a benefit exclusion or supply missing evidence. Request a precise explanation and coordinate additions with the practice so they address the actual reason, rather than simply making the file larger.

Can I upload the refusal in the comments?

Please do not publish insurance numbers, medical reports or personal decisions in public comments. Use the practice’s and insurer’s designated secure channels. A general question can use an anonymised description, without including your medical documents or anyone else’s health information.

Sources & further reading

  1. G-BA: Anlage II der Arzneimittel-Richtlinie
  2. BAG: Leistungen bei Arzneimitteln
  3. ÖGK: Erstattungskodex
  4. Assurance Maladie: Verordnung und Erstattung von Wegovy und Mounjaro

Sources checked:

eu. infopoint editorial team

Researched and created with AI assistance. This article has not undergone individual review by a medical professional.

About our health information

Published:

Report a correction

Questions and experiences

Share a question or a useful experience about this topic. Every contribution is checked before publication. Comments may be written in different languages.

Loading reader contributions…

Opening the form sets a necessary session cookie. No email address is required. Publication is subject to moderation and is not guaranteed. For deletion requests: Contact